Skip to content

chore: sync Rust client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-09-10T091137Z - #25

Open
Pijukatel wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
sync-spec-v2-2026-09-10
Open

chore: sync Rust client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-09-10T091137Z#25
Pijukatel wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
sync-spec-v2-2026-09-10

Conversation

@Pijukatel

@Pijukatel Pijukatel commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Syncs to OpenAPI spec v2-2026-09-10T091137Z (apify/apify-docs#2965).

That spec change only documents pagination response headers already returned by the API on 17 list endpoints, adds the X-Apify-Pagination-Desc header, and documents the pre-existing offset/limit/desc query parameters on the webhook-dispatches-by-webhook endpoint. The client's shared list/iterate implementation already covered all of this, so this PR only bumps API_SPEC_VERSION and the crate version, with a CHANGELOG.md entry.

All unit and live integration tests pass; cargo fmt/clippy -D warnings are clean.

@apify-service-account apify-service-account added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Sep 11, 2026
@Pijukatel Pijukatel added the adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. label Sep 11, 2026 — with Claude
The new spec version (apify/apify-docs#2965) only documents pagination
response headers already returned by the API on 17 list endpoints, adds
the X-Apify-Pagination-Desc header, and documents the pre-existing
offset/limit/desc query parameters on the webhook-dispatches-by-webhook
endpoint. The client's shared list/iterate implementation already
supported all of this, so no functional code changes were required.
@Pijukatel
Pijukatel force-pushed the sync-spec-v2-2026-09-10 branch from 204c353 to c791d4e Compare September 11, 2026 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

adhoc Ad-hoc unplanned task added during the sprint. t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants