Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[4.0] experiment: namespace hook-related types #12466

Closed

Conversation

phryneas
Copy link
Member

@phryneas phryneas commented Mar 20, 2025

I promised I'd do a PR so we can see this in action for one hook - WDYT @jerelmiller ?

No change in runtime files: https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-client/actions/runs/13965926007?pr=12466

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Mar 20, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3646438

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@svc-apollo-docs
Copy link

svc-apollo-docs commented Mar 20, 2025

⚠️ Docs preview not attached to branch

The preview was not built because the PR's base branch jerel/inline-react-types is not in the list of sources.

An Apollo team member can comment one of the following commands to dictate which branch to attach the preview to:

  • !docs set-base-branch version-2.6
  • !docs set-base-branch main

Build ID: 46dd71345415bd406b085e81

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Mar 20, 2025

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@apollo/client@12466

commit: 3646438

@jerelmiller
Copy link
Member

Will use this but do this on #12465 instead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants