Skip to content

Conversation

@rmondello
Copy link
Contributor

They're the same entity. Based on an email communication from the service, I can see that monarchmoney.com is being phased out, but is still active at this time. Thus, a shared group.

Overall Checklist

for shared-credentials.json

  • There's evidence the domains are currently related (SSL certificates, DNS entries, valid links between sites, legal documents etc.)
  • If using shared, the new group serves login pages on each of the included domains, and those login pages accept accounts from the others. (For example, we wouldn't use a shared association from google.co.il to google.com, because google.co.il redirects to accounts.google.com for sign in.)
  • If using from and to, the new group, the from domain(s) redirect to the to domain to log in.

They're the same entity. Based on an email communication from the service, I can see that monarchmoney.com is being
phased out, but is still active at this time. Thus, a shared group.
@aabosh aabosh merged commit 3fdd9b1 into apple:main Oct 16, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants