Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jul 14, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
svelte-preprocess ^5.0.4 -> ^6.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sveltejs/svelte-preprocess (svelte-preprocess)

v6.0.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v6.0.0

Compare Source

BREAKING CHANGES
  • remove TS mixed imports support, require TS 5.0 or higher
  • remove preserve option as it's unnecessary
  • require Svelte 4+, Node 18+
  • add exports map
Bug Fixes
  • adjust globalifySelector to not split selectors with parentheses. (#​632) (c435ebd), closes #​501
  • fix: allow TS filename to be undefined, fixes #​488
  • fix: adjust Svelte compiler type import
  • fix: remove pug types and magic-string from dependencies
  • chore: bump peer deps, fixes #​553

5.1.4 (2024-04-16)

Bug Fixes

5.1.3 (2023-12-18)

Bug Fixes
  • sass dependency list referencing source file in win32 (#​621) (209312f)

5.1.2 (2023-12-12)

  • chore: mark postcss-load-config 5 as supported (3b5b1f0)

5.1.1 (2023-11-21)

Bug Fixes
  • force module(resolution) (66d3cf9)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 2 weeks on Monday" in timezone Europe/London, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/svelte-preprocess-6.x branch from 9a5a26e to 8ce2872 Compare December 24, 2024 15:20
@bluecco bluecco merged commit 62b48ba into develop Dec 24, 2024
1 check passed
@bluecco bluecco deleted the renovate/svelte-preprocess-6.x branch December 24, 2024 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants