-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
fix(appcontroller): application controller in core mode fails to sync when server.secretkey is missing #26793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
anandf
wants to merge
5
commits into
argoproj:master
Choose a base branch
from
anandf:fix_missing_server_key
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+290
−32
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
46ff9dc
fix(appcontroller): application controller in core mode fails to sync…
anandf bb817fb
fixed unit tests to use require instead of assert
anandf 879df5c
Added methods in SettingsManager to check if in-cluster is enabled
anandf 28e23b0
removed the wrapper method and using error check logic for in-cluster…
anandf b3ce464
added constant defaultInClusterEnabledFlag to give a meaning to why w…
anandf File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, thanks for the PR!
This is slightly different from the previous contract discussion, but since this code path only needs
InClusterEnabledwhileGetSettings()assembles much broader state, would it make sense to add a narrower helper onSettingsManagerfor just this flag so callers do not need to depend on the broaderGetSettings()contract here?Something along these lines, for example,
Also, I notice some paths in this file now call isInClusterEnabled(...) multiple times within the same flow, so even if introducing a narrower helper feels out of scope here, it may still be worth reading the value once and reusing it locally where possible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @choejwoo for your review, I agree that a direct helper in
SettingsManagerwill be better. Let me make that change.