Skip to content

allow override of docker image - #728

Open
gdw2 wants to merge 2 commits into
arunoda:mupxfrom
gdw2:mupx
Open

allow override of docker image#728
gdw2 wants to merge 2 commits into
arunoda:mupxfrom
gdw2:mupx

Conversation

@gdw2

@gdw2 gdw2 commented Oct 31, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Use case:

My meteor app depends on having the graphicsmagick binary installed, so I want to use a docker image, based off meteord, that contains the dependency.

Comment thread README.md Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is mup.json file. Not the settings.json file.
Also, show a code sample on to do it. Just having the dockerImage key is enough.

Also, add a link to to MeteorD

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

May be you can link also another document on how to extend MeteorD. May be a blog post of yours.
Anyway, that can be done later.

@arunoda

arunoda commented Nov 3, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Mention me once you done changes. It's hard to track it otherwise.
On 2015 නොවැ 4, බදාදා at පෙ.ව. 12.24 gdw2 notifications@github.com wrote:

This may address #728 zodern/meteor-up#728


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
zodern/meteor-up#728 (comment).

@gdw2

gdw2 commented Nov 4, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Thanks for the feedback. Will fix this week.

@bompi88

bompi88 commented Nov 16, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown

+1

@MichaelJCole

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I was just about to make these same changes. @gdw2 did they work well for you?

@gdw2 @arunoda is there any help I can offer to move this over the finish line?

@gdw2

gdw2 commented Dec 8, 2015

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@arunoda . I addressed your review comments.
@MichaelJCole . It has worked well for me.

@v3rron

v3rron commented Jan 3, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@arunoda can you pls accept this pull request? thanks

@bompi88

bompi88 commented Jan 13, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gdw2 @arunoda Shouldn't this be configurable for all deploy targets as well as the general option?

@bompi88

bompi88 commented Jan 21, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Looks like this will be the new mup? Haven't tried it with custom docker image yet, though.

@MasterJames

Copy link
Copy Markdown

It will have that. I'm pretty sure I saw a post in the new still under development version to add custom docker images.

@comigor

comigor commented Feb 15, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Oh please merge it already

@MasterJames

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This account in general has been depreciated and mupx has almost been ported to kadirahq.
For the record I am no an official representative.
All unmerged PRs need to be ported to the new version. I believe there will be a more regorious need to comply with dev&submission methods/requirements, which are still being outlined for Mantra in general. Basically meaning tests are now needed to accept Pull Requests. I don't think any or many PRs here do, mine don't.

@comigor

comigor commented Feb 15, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@MasterJames oh, nice, I wasn't aware of that. Thank you!

@eskan

eskan commented Jun 5, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown

very useful PR : @arunoda may you merge it ?
thanks

@MasterJames

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No PRs have been merged here for a very long time. It is considered the stable version partly for that reason.
New development is at kadirahq/meteor-up if there's a PR of interest here that is still needed in the new version then it could be redone for consideration there. It wouldn't hurt to ask the devs there if it's needed and desired first.
Oh I already commented here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants