Adding lab .Rmd to correspond to YouTube Labs#69
Open
MichaelChirico wants to merge 5 commits intoasadoughi:masterfrom
MichaelChirico:add_lab_rmd
Open
Adding lab .Rmd to correspond to YouTube Labs#69MichaelChirico wants to merge 5 commits intoasadoughi:masterfrom MichaelChirico:add_lab_rmd
MichaelChirico wants to merge 5 commits intoasadoughi:masterfrom
MichaelChirico:add_lab_rmd
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Was following along the YouTube series and noticed they started using .Rmds in the Chapter 6 Labs, and the commands used there are in dissonance with the "Chapter 6 Lab" found elsewhere. Couldn't find this .Rmd anywhere online (though I did find the HTML output here), so I made it myself.
I've also made a few minor adjustments reflecting best practices, e.g. replacing
rep(NA, 19)withnumeric(19L)since the latter is declared in the correct type and is ever-so-slightly more efficient (about 10% by my measure).