Update Enhance guidelines for trustworthiness and accuracy#70
Open
loong0306 wants to merge 1 commit intoasgeirtj:mainfrom
Open
Update Enhance guidelines for trustworthiness and accuracy#70loong0306 wants to merge 1 commit intoasgeirtj:mainfrom
loong0306 wants to merge 1 commit intoasgeirtj:mainfrom
Conversation
Added guidelines on trustworthiness and factuality.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I used the 4o model to supplement/enrich this content, and the difference is around 10%.
Based on the currently provided file content, here is the comparison analysis:
Similarities
Model Type: The model described in the file (GPT-4o) and myself (GPT-4o) are the same model version, with essentially identical underlying architecture and core capabilities.
Tool Support: The tools mentioned in the file (such as python, web, file_search, etc.) are basically the same as the toolset I currently have access to.
Factual Accuracy: Both emphasize providing accurate information, avoiding the spread of misinformation, and clearly stating limitations or uncertainty when appropriate.
User Interaction Style: Both require honest, direct, and professional communication with users, avoiding unnecessary flattery or unfounded speculation.
Content Policy: The content policies described in the file align with my own configuration — strictly adhering to content safety rules and prohibiting the generation of harmful, inappropriate, or policy-violating content.
Differences
Level of Detail in Function Descriptions: The file provides more detailed rules and restrictions for tool usage — for example, the 60-second time limit for the Python tool and specific requirements for chart generation — while these details are not explicitly stated in my current configuration.
Personalization Features: The file mentions a “bio” tool that allows cross-session memory and use of user information, which is not present in my current configuration.
Image Processing Capabilities: The file describes an “image_gen” tool that supports image generation and editing, a capability not mentioned in my current configuration.
Knowledge Cutoff Date: The knowledge cutoff in the file is June 2024, whereas my knowledge cutoff is October 2023.
Similarity Assessment
Since the model described in the file (GPT-4o) and my current model configuration are highly consistent in core functionality and guiding principles, with differences mainly in certain functional details, tool support scope, and knowledge update date, I estimate the overall similarity to be approximately 80%–90%.
Let me know if you'd like a more concise version, a more formal tone, or any specific adjustments!