✨ Swift #60
✨ Swift #60
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@NatoBoram has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces support for the Swift programming language in the ast-grep ecosystem. It adds a new package, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/swift/package.json (3)
4-4: Add a meaningful descriptionThe description field is empty. Consider adding a descriptive summary like "Swift language support for ast-grep" to help users understand the package's purpose.
22-22: Add author informationThe author field is empty. Consider adding the author information for proper attribution.
21-21: Consider adding more keywordsAdding more relevant keywords like "swift", "parser", "language", etc., would make the package more discoverable in npm searches.
packages/swift/nursery.js (1)
1-16: Consider adding more comprehensive test casesWhile the current test verifies basic functionality, consider adding more complex test cases that cover a wider range of Swift syntax patterns (e.g., classes, protocols, closures).
For example:
testRunner: parse => { // Test 1: Basic function call let sg = parse('println("123")') let node = sg.root().find('println("123")') assert.equal(node.kind(), 'call_expression') // Test 2: Class definition sg = parse('class MyClass { func test() {} }') node = sg.root().find('class MyClass') assert.equal(node.kind(), 'class_declaration') // Test 3: Swift protocol sg = parse('protocol MyProtocol { func required() }') node = sg.root().find('protocol MyProtocol') assert.equal(node.kind(), 'protocol_declaration') }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/swift/README.md(1 hunks)packages/swift/index.d.ts(1 hunks)packages/swift/index.js(1 hunks)packages/swift/nursery.js(1 hunks)packages/swift/package.json(1 hunks)packages/swift/postinstall.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
packages/swift/postinstall.js (1)
1-4: LGTM! Clean and straightforward postinstall script.The script correctly imports the
postinstallfunction from@ast-grep/setup-langand invokes it with the current directory, which is a standard pattern for language package setup in ast-grep.packages/swift/index.d.ts (2)
1-7: Type definition looks good and follows the expected pattern.The
LanguageRegistrationtype correctly defines the interface for language registration with appropriate optional properties, matching what's needed for the Swift language implementation.
9-10: Export pattern is clean and follows TypeScript best practices.The declaration and default export of the
registrationconstant follows the standard pattern for ast-grep language packages.packages/swift/index.js (2)
1-3: Path resolution looks correct.Good use of the Node.js path module to ensure proper resolution of the parser library path regardless of the runtime environment.
4-9: Swift language configuration is properly defined.The configuration correctly specifies:
- Swift file extension
- Tree-sitter symbol for Swift
- An expando character for AST pattern matching
This follows the standard pattern used by other language packages in ast-grep.
packages/swift/README.md (2)
1-13: Installation instructions are clear and complete.The README provides clear steps for installing the necessary packages in a pnpm project, including the optional development dependency for cases where prebuilt binaries aren't available.
14-24: Usage example is helpful and demonstrates the key functionality.The code example effectively shows how to:
- Import the Swift language support
- Register the language dynamically
- Parse Swift code and access the AST
This gives users a good starting point for integrating Swift language support into their projects.
packages/swift/package.json (7)
3-4: Version number looks good for a new packageThe initial version of 0.0.1 is appropriate for a new package that's just being introduced to the ecosystem.
6-12: Scripts look well structuredThe scripts setup follows best practices with appropriate hooks for building, testing, and installation.
13-20: Package files list looks completeThe files to be included in the package are properly specified, including the necessary JavaScript files, type definitions, and prebuilt binaries.
24-26: Dependency version is pinned correctlyUsing a specific version (0.0.3) for @ast-grep/setup-lang ensures consistency.
30-34: Optional peer dependency is appropriateMaking tree-sitter-cli an optional peer dependency is a good practice, allowing users to install it only if needed.
40-43: Publishing configuration is correctThe publishConfig section properly specifies public access and the npm registry.
27-29:⚠️ Potential issueFix version mismatch in tree-sitter-cli dependency
The peerDependency version of tree-sitter-cli (0.24.6) doesn't match the version in devDependencies (0.24.6). This looks like a typo.
"peerDependencies": { - "tree-sitter-cli": "0.24.6" + "tree-sitter-cli": "0.24.6" },Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
packages/swift/nursery.js (3)
1-3: Import statements are clear and conciseThe require statements properly import the necessary dependencies including the Node.js built-in assert module.
5-9: Setup configuration is correctly structuredThe setup configuration includes all necessary parameters for the Swift language integration:
- dirname set to current directory
- name set to 'swift'
- treeSitterPackage linked to 'tree-sitter-swift'
- languageRegistration correctly passed from the local index
10-15: Test runner covers basic functionalityThe test runner appropriately tests a basic Swift syntax pattern by:
- Parsing a simple println statement
- Verifying that the AST node is identified as a call_expression
This provides a good basic sanity check for the Swift parser integration.
NatoBoram
force-pushed
the
feature/swift
branch
2 times, most recently
from
09dca66 to
4f41a5a
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Type Definitions
LanguageRegistrationto enhance type safety and clarity.Testing