fix: template output for send and receive operations fixed#622
Merged
asyncapi-bot merged 1 commit intoasyncapi:masterfrom Feb 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
|
Member
|
/rtm |
Contributor
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.6.7 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Description
This PR introduces the changes to fix the markdown-template output for the send and receive operations and make it consistent with other templates as like HTML template.
Tests have been also updated as well and are all passing.
Related issue(s)
Resolves #594
@derberg can you please review the PR and provide feedback.
Thanks.