Skip to content

feat:Added dark mode theme#2202

Closed
prashantrai-30 wants to merge 2 commits intoasyncapi:masterfrom
prashantrai-30:dark-mode
Closed

feat:Added dark mode theme#2202
prashantrai-30 wants to merge 2 commits intoasyncapi:masterfrom
prashantrai-30:dark-mode

Conversation

@prashantrai-30
Copy link

Description

Related Issue

Checklist

  • The code follows the project's coding standards and is properly linted (npm run lint).
  • Tests have been added or updated to cover the changes.
  • Documentation has been updated to reflect the changes.
  • All tests pass successfully locally.(npm run test).

Additional Notes

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Mar 9, 2025

We require all PRs to follow Conventional Commits specification.
More details 👇🏼

 No release type found in pull request title "feat:Added dark mode theme". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for modelina failed.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3cbe0b2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/modelina/deploys/67d6fb3dceff890008ce4885

@ashmitjsg
Copy link
Member

Hi @prashantrai-30 Can you please check why the deploy preview failed and resolve the issue?

@prashantrai-30 prashantrai-30 changed the title Feat:Added dark mode theme feat:Added dark mode theme Mar 16, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
19.6% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
B Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Mar 16, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13885269620

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 92.404%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13828914384: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 6487
Relevant Lines: 6882

💛 - Coveralls

@prashantrai-30
Copy link
Author

Hey @devilkiller-ag ,
Can you tell me why some checks are failing.

@prashantrai-30
Copy link
Author

Hey @devilkiller-ag ,
can you help me to figure out the issue??

@ashmitjsg
Copy link
Member

ashmitjsg commented Mar 27, 2025

Hey @devilkiller-ag ,
can you help me to figure out the issue??

Hi @prashantrai-30 , The deploy is failing did you checked out the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/modelina/deploys/67d6fb3dceff890008ce4885?

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni closed this May 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants