Route shadowed arguments typeof through unified bytecode

[rogeralsing]

Summary

• apply arguments binding-resolution to TypeOfIdentifier as well as normal reads
• route typeof on parameter/lexical arguments through production unified bytecode
• keep typeof on the implicit arguments object declined and documented

Verification

• rtk dotnet test tests/Asynkron.JsEngine.Tests -c Release --filter "FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionInvocationTests.TypeOfParameterNamedArguments_UsesUnifiedBytecodeProductionFastPath|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionInvocationTests.TypeOfImplicitArgumentsObject_DeclinesAndFallsBack|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionInvocationTests.ParameterNamedArguments_UsesUnifiedBytecodeProductionFastPath|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionInvocationTests.LexicalArgumentsBinding_UsesUnifiedBytecodeProductionFastPath|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionEligibilityTests.Evaluate_TypeOfParameterNamedArguments_AcceptsAsActivationSlot|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionEligibilityTests.Evaluate_TypeOfImplicitArgumentsObject_DeclinesWithArgumentsDependency|FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionEligibilityTests.Evaluate_ArgumentsAccess_DeclinesWithArgumentsDependency|FullyQualifiedNameExpressionProgramCoverageMapTests.UnifiedBytecodeExpansionContract_ListsRequiredHeadingsAndCurrentEnums"
• rtk dotnet test tests/Asynkron.JsEngine.Tests -c Release --filter "FullyQualifiedNameUnifiedBytecodeProductionEligibilityTests|FullyQualifiedNameExpressionProgramCoverageMapTests.UnifiedBytecodeExpansionContract_ListsRequiredHeadingsAndCurrentEnums|FullyQualifiedName~UnifiedBytecodeProductionInvocationTests"
• rtk dotnet test tests/Asynkron.JsEngine.Tests -c Release --filter "FullyQualifiedName~ActivationSemanticsProofPackTests"
• rtk rg "EvaluateExpression(|ProfileEvaluateExpression(" src/Asynkron.JsEngine/Ast/TypedAstEvaluator.ExecutionPlanRunner* (no matches)
• rtk ./tools/profile forloop --memory (Total allocated 6.85 MB)
• rtk git diff --check

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.