Fix container subscription leak in strict mode #228
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Subscribing on store creation is a problem in
StrictMode, as the double triggering of the side effects makes containers resubscribe while we are in cleanup phase.So we move the Container subscription to the store to a
useEffect, which is a recommended pattern anyway, so it would not be triggered as the component is unmounted.This should be fixing both #225 and #226 as tests for update/destroy were failing with strict mode. Now I've enabled it on most integration tests, adding an util to keep re-renders in check anyway.
cc @hinok @dclark-atlassian