ci: increase fuzz timeout to 45s in E2E Nightly to reduce flakes#48
Closed
SebTardif wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
ci: increase fuzz timeout to 45s in E2E Nightly to reduce flakes#48SebTardif wants to merge 1 commit into
SebTardif wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Refs #47 Signed-off-by: Sebastien Tardif <sebtardif@ncf.ca>
Contributor
Author
|
Closing: the fuzz timeout flake occurred once in 3 runs, which is thin evidence. Increasing 30s to 45s just moves the boundary without fixing the root cause (slow fuzz iterations). If it recurs, we should investigate why individual iterations are slow rather than adding padding. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Increases the coverage-guided fuzz budget from 30s → 45s for both fuzz targets in the nightly workflow.
This should significantly reduce the 'context deadline exceeded' flakes we see on FuzzRecommendationEngine.
Refs #47