fix: rename acmetool to acme to match repo name and fix alphabetical order

[morning-verlu]

What changed

The link text acmetool does not match the repository name acme (https://github.com/hlandau/acme). Renaming it to acme also fixes the alphabetical ordering in the Security section, as acme sorts before acme-proxy. This resolves the TestAlpha CI failure (see #6550).

Forge link: https://github.com/hlandau/acme
pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/hlandau/acme
goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/hlandau/acme

[qodo-code-review]

ⓘ Your Qodo trial ends soon. Ask your workspace admin to set up billing to keep reviews running after the trial. Manage billing

[qodo-code-review]

PR Summary by Qodo

Fix acme name and Security list ordering

🐞 Bug fix 📝 Documentation 🕐 Less than 5 minutes

AI Description

• Rename acmetool to acme to match the linked repository.
• Restore alphabetical ordering in the Security section and resolve TestAlpha failures.

High-Level Assessment

The direct label correction is optimal: it preserves the existing repository URL and description while aligning the displayed name with the upstream project and alphabetical-list validation.

Files changed (1) +1 / -1

Bug fix (1) +1 / -1

README.mdCorrect acme project name in Security section +1/-1

Correct acme project name in Security section

• Renames the displayed 'acmetool' entry to 'acme', matching the linked repository and restoring alphabetical ordering before 'acme-proxy'.

README.md

[qodo-code-review]

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Tip of the day

💡 Did you know, you can keep summaries lean with Finding overflow, which tucks the rest behind 'View more'

More tips ↗ | Customize Qodo ↗ | Qodo docs ↗

[qodo-code-review]

Qodo Fixer

No findings are available for this PR yet. Findings appear here once Qodo has reviewed the PR.

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks

Required checks

❌ Repo: missing go.mod

How to fix: No go.mod file found at the repository root.
Initialize Go modules in your project:

go mod init github.com/your-org/your-project
go mod tidy
git add go.mod go.sum && git commit -m "add go module" && git push

✅ pkg.go.dev: OK
✅ Go Report Card: OK (grade unknown)

Additional checks

⚠️ License: no open source license detected

How to fix: Add a LICENSE file to your repository root.
Choose one at https://choosealicense.com — common choices for Go projects: MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD-3-Clause.
✅ Maturity: repo has 5+ months of history
⚠️ CI/CD: no GitHub Actions workflows found
How to fix: Add a CI workflow to run tests automatically.
Create .github/workflows/test.yml — see https://docs.github.com/en/actions/use-cases-and-examples/building-and-testing/building-and-testing-go
✅ README: present
⚠️ Coverage: missing from PR body
How to fix: Add a coverage service link to your PR description:

Coverage: https://app.codecov.io/gh/your-org/your-project

Popular options: [Codecov](https://codecov.io), [Coveralls](https://coveralls.io). Integrate one with your CI to track coverage automatically.

---
> **Action needed:** one or more required checks failed. Please update your PR body with the missing links and ensure the repository meets the [quality standards](https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#quality-standards).

_These checks are automated and do not replace maintainer review. See [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/avelino/awesome-go/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) for full guidelines._

---

## PR Diff Validation

### Content checks

✅ **Files changed**: only README.md
✅ **Link consistency**: README link matches forge link in PR body
✅ **Link text**: matches repository name
✅ **Description**: ends with punctuation
✅ **Description tone**: no promotional language detected
✅ **Category size**: Security has 62 items

### Warnings

⚠️ **Changes**: 1 added + 1 removed (update or move — please confirm in PR description)


_Automated diff validation — does not replace maintainer review._
<!-- Sticky Pull Request Commentpr-quality-check -->