Skip to content

feat(api): add appsync client interface - #4217

Open
jvh-aws wants to merge 2 commits into
feat/appsync-clientfrom
jv/appsync-client-add-interface
Open

feat(api): add appsync client interface#4217
jvh-aws wants to merge 2 commits into
feat/appsync-clientfrom
jv/appsync-client-add-interface

Conversation

@jvh-aws

@jvh-aws jvh-aws commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Issue #

Description

General Checklist

  • Added new tests to cover change, if needed
  • Build succeeds with all target using Swift Package Manager
  • All unit tests pass
  • All integration tests pass
  • Security oriented best practices and standards are followed (e.g. using input sanitization, principle of least privilege, etc)
  • Documentation update for the change if required
  • PR title conforms to conventional commit style
  • New or updated tests include Given When Then inline code documentation and are named accordingly testThing_condition_expectation()
  • If breaking change, documentation/changelog update with migration instructions

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@jvh-aws
jvh-aws requested a review from a team as a code owner May 8, 2026 10:34
@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (feat/appsync-client@47c9ed6). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                   @@
##             feat/appsync-client    #4217   +/-   ##
======================================================
  Coverage                       ?   66.75%           
======================================================
  Files                          ?     1151           
  Lines                          ?    43817           
  Branches                       ?        0           
======================================================
  Hits                           ?    29248           
  Misses                         ?    14569           
  Partials                       ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
API_plugin_unit_test 68.42% <ø> (?)
AWSPluginsCore 68.48% <ø> (?)
Amplify 47.49% <ø> (?)
Amplify_Foundation_Bridge_unit_test 62.28% <ø> (?)
Amplify_Foundation_unit_test 67.64% <ø> (?)
Analytics_plugin_unit_test 83.43% <ø> (?)
Auth_plugin_unit_test 72.28% <ø> (?)
DataStore_plugin_unit_test 81.80% <ø> (?)
Firehose_plugin_unit_test 53.15% <ø> (?)
Geo_plugin_unit_test 73.39% <ø> (?)
Kinesis_plugin_unit_test 52.17% <ø> (?)
Logging_plugin_unit_test 64.86% <ø> (?)
Predictions_plugin_unit_test 33.89% <ø> (?)
PushNotifications_plugin_unit_test 85.66% <ø> (?)
RecordCache_unit_test 76.40% <ø> (?)
Storage_plugin_unit_test 78.67% <ø> (?)
unit_tests 66.75% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

}

/// Infer the AWS region from an AppSync endpoint URL.
/// Expected format: `https://{id}.appsync-api.{region}.amazonaws.com/graphql`

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just FYI, china regions are slightly different example appsync-api.cn-north-1.amazonaws.com.cn

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants