Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UpdateExpression at request level #3836

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cenedhryn
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation and Context

Modifications

Testing

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • Local run of mvn install succeeds
  • My code follows the code style of this project
  • My change requires a change to the Javadoc documentation
  • I have updated the Javadoc documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed
  • I have added a changelog entry. Adding a new entry must be accomplished by running the scripts/new-change script and following the instructions. Commit the new file created by the script in .changes/next-release with your changes.
  • My change is to implement 1.11 parity feature and I have updated LaunchChangelog

License

  • I confirm that this pull request can be released under the Apache 2 license

@cenedhryn cenedhryn requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2023 17:35
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 14 Code Smells

90.2% 90.2% Coverage
4.6% 4.6% Duplication

@mskomrak
Copy link

Hey @cenedhryn, do you maybe have some info when this could be available? The PR has been opened some time ago and it seems to contain some really useful improvements.

@AndresBena19
Copy link

I am also hoping to get this merge to be able to use it, since for my use case I want to update atomically a value but not during every put item

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants