Fix(tinkerbell): Use cluster spec for worker maxSurge validation insead of generated CAPI object #10453
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
https://github.com/aws/eks-anywhere-internal/issues/3776
Description of changes:
The hardware validation for worker node rollouts was reading maxSurge from the generated MachineDeployment's Strategy.Type field. However, the template generation code only sets Strategy.Type for InPlace upgrades, leaving it empty for RollingUpdate. This caused the maxSurge check to be skipped, defaulting to 1 instead of using the user-configured value.
For example, with maxSurge=3 configured, validation would only require 1 spare hardware instead of 3, potentially causing mid-rollout failures.
The fix reads the upgrade strategy directly from the EKS-A cluster spec (workerNodeGroup.UpgradeRolloutStrategy) instead of the generated CAPI object, consistent with how KCP validation already works.
Added unit tests to verify:
Testing (if applicable):
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.