feat(CHAIN-2508): set up update gas params task

[jackchuma]

No description provided.

[linear]

CHAIN-2508 Prepare smart contract upgrade & rollback script for gas increase

[cb-heimdall]

✅ Heimdall Review Status

Requirement	Status	More Info
Reviews	✅ 2/2	Denominator calculation Show calculation 1 if user is bot 0 1 if user is external 0 2 if repo is sensitive 0 From .codeflow.yml 2 Additional review requirements Show calculation Max 0 0 From CODEOWNERS 0 Global minimum 0 Max 2 2 1 if commit is unverified 0 Sum 2

[cb-heimdall]

🟡 Heimdall Review Status

Requirement	Status	More Info
Reviews	🟡 0/2	Denominator calculation Show calculation 1 if user is bot 0 1 if user is external 0 2 if repo is sensitive 0 From .codeflow.yml 2 Additional review requirements Show calculation Max 0 0 From CODEOWNERS 0 Global minimum 0 Max 2 2 1 if commit is unverified 0 Sum 2

[leopoldjoy]

Once the state overrides are set (as in my suggestion below), then these pre-checks can be included (from here):

Suggested change

	function setUp() external view {
	vm.assertEq(ISystemConfig(SYSTEM_CONFIG).eip1559Denominator(), DENOMINATOR, "Denominator mismatch");
	vm.assertEq(ISystemConfig(SYSTEM_CONFIG).eip1559Elasticity(), ELASTICITY, "Elasticity mismatch");
	vm.assertEq(ISystemConfig(SYSTEM_CONFIG).gasLimit(), GAS_LIMIT, "Gas Limit mismatch");
	}

[jackchuma]

I actually think the precheck doesn't work even with the overrides set. I noticed our usual gas limit script doesn't include the precheck either. I'm fine excluding this

[leopoldjoy]

What issue did you encounter with the precheck? It works for me locally with the overrides set.

I don't mind either way, whichever you prefer!

Approved review 3445054470 from xenoliss is now dismissed due to new commit. Re-request for approval.

[roger-bai-coinbase]

LGTM