Skip to content
View bchtitihi's full-sized avatar

Block or report bchtitihi

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don’t include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown is supported. This note will only be visible to you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
bchtitihi/README.md

Hi, I'm Brahim πŸ‘‹

Front-end developer turned AI-assisted audit specialist.

I build methodologies for auditing legacy codebases with adversarial AI agent teams using Claude Code.


πŸ”¬ Current work

legacy-audit-agents β€” An open-source methodology for auditing legacy codebases with dual-team adversarial AI agents.

Built from 7 real iterations on a 250K LOC, 20-year-old monolith:

Iteration 1:  1 agent   β†’ hallucinated 4 classes that didn't exist
Iteration 7: 11 agents  β†’ 81.8% reliability score, adversarial-verified

168 verified findings. 889 "foreign keys" corrected to 15 real. 4 AI hallucinations caught and eliminated. Every mistake documented so others don't repeat them.

The repo includes progressive setups (Level 2β†’7) so you can iterate the same way β€” not just copy the final config.

πŸ› οΈ Stack

TypeScript Β· React Β· Vue/Nuxt Β· Tailwind Β· Python/FastAPI Β· Claude Code Β· Agent Teams

πŸ’‘ What I care about

  • Proof over assumptions β€” every claim needs file:line evidence
  • Adversarial review β€” if a second team can't disprove it, it's probably true
  • Documented failure β€” publishing what went wrong is more valuable than showing what worked

πŸ“« Connect

LinkedIn

Popular repositories Loading

  1. legacy-audit-agents legacy-audit-agents Public

    Audit legacy codebases with adversarial AI agent teams β€” 7 iterations, 168 findings, 81.8% reliability score

    3

  2. bchtitihi bchtitihi Public