Skip to content

feat: new search UI #257

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 61 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: new search UI #257

wants to merge 61 commits into from

Conversation

davidlougheed
Copy link
Member

@davidlougheed davidlougheed commented Mar 18, 2025

WIP
TODO: rename pane url param for search...

requires Katsu to be edge / develop branch latest

Base automatically changed from individual-view-update to main March 18, 2025 16:50
@davidlougheed davidlougheed changed the base branch from main to refact/request-status March 18, 2025 19:07
Base automatically changed from refact/request-status to main March 21, 2025 14:59
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ const CatalogueCard = ({ project }: { project: Project }) => {
datasets.length ? (
<>
<Title level={5} style={{ marginTop: 0 }}>
{t('Datasets')}
{t('entities.dataset', T_PLURAL_COUNT)}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From my understanding the T_PLURAL_COUNT would produce a plural form of Dataset translated. But as T_PLURAL_COUNT is constant, it is not context dependent. Then:

  • What's the difference between this and what you changed before?
  • Wouldn't having it dynamic to the number of datasets make more sense?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

suggested changes in notion doc

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i want it discoverable, and pushing it below the fold imo makes it less discoverable...

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could maybe make start with something like create a search that asks to choose b/w filters or free text?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ideally I want the min. # clicks to get to a FTS.

@davidlougheed
Copy link
Member Author

@gsfk still WIP but soliciting feedback on this if you have some time tomorrow/friday...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants