Enhance README.md with clearer language and structure

[blckmn]

Updated README.md for clarity and improved instructions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Clarified and expanded documentation with semantic revisions for improved accuracy and user guidance
  • Enhanced formatting with explicit bullet-point structure for better readability
  • Added clearer applicability information for target-specific configurations

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@blckmn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 43 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a87ae46 and b0e0ba1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

Walkthrough

Documentation updates to README.md including semantic revisions to descriptions, expanded guidance text, clarifications around cloud build and target defaults, added bullet-point formatting in NOTICE section, and new preface sentence in TIMER_MAP section for target-specific clarification.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation and README updates README.md	Semantic revisions to descriptions (e.g., "default board settings" vs "board settings"), expanded guidance and rephrasing for clarity. Added explicit bullet-point formatting in NOTICE, updated eligibility criteria, included concrete PR handling example, and added preface sentence in TIMER_MAP section clarifying target applicability (e.g., STM32).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description is minimal and does not follow the required template structure. It lacks mandatory sections including hardware compliance requirements, flight controller review process, checklist items, and housekeeping details specified in the template.	Provide a complete description following the template structure with all required sections, checklist items, and relevant compliance information for the README.md changes being made.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: updating README.md with clearer language and improved structure, which aligns with the file-level summaries showing semantic revisions and formatting improvements.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}