Tier: STANDARD Date: 2026-07-17 Status: Verified from chain state Owner: builder loop
Doc 1201 flagged the Fractal week count ("90+" vs "100+" vs "ninety consecutive" across docs) as needs canonical source. This doc resolves what is resolvable from chain state — and in doing so uncovers a piece of institutional history that was not written down anywhere: the Respect token is two-phase.
North Star #1 (the documented, cited DAO): the Fractal is the flagship, so its numbers must be defensible. Sibling to doc 1200 (holder counts).
Verified 2026-07-17 by enumerating the full transfer history of both Respect tokens on Optimism (Blockscout, no key):
| Phase | Token | Distinct weeks w/ activity | Span | Distribution txs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OG (ERC-20) 0x34cE…6957 |
33 | 2024-07-30 → 2025-12-20 | 438 |
| 2 | ZOR (ERC-1155) 0x9885…445c |
31 | 2025-09-25 → 2026-07-06 (active) | 67 |
| Combined | OG ∪ ZOR | 63 distinct weeks | 2024-07-30 → 2026-07-06 | — |
(The two phases overlap in only 1 ISO week — OG wound down as ZOR came online in late 2025; on-chain settlement effectively migrated ERC-20 → ERC-1155 rather than running both in parallel.)
So there are 63 distinct weeks of on-chain Respect settlement spanning ~2 years, in
two token phases. The OG ERC-20's per-week transfer count is high (438 tx / 33 wk ≈ 13/wk)
because early distribution sent individual transfers (447 of them from zaal.eth); ZOR
batches (67 tx / 31 wk ≈ 2/wk, mint execute from 0x0). Distinct-weeks, not tx count,
is the robust metric.
These do not contradict — they measure different things:
- "90+ / 100+ weeks" = the Fractal game count: weekly Respect Game sessions, recorded off-chain via the Fractal Discord bot (see doc 1069) and Optimystics. The game predates the on-chain token (OG's first mint is 2024-07-30, and the game had already run many weeks by then).
- "63 weeks" = the weeks whose results were settled on-chain (2024-07 → present).
Cite discipline: say which one. "100+ weekly Respect Games (Discord-recorded), with on-chain Respect settlement across 63 weeks on Optimism (OG ERC-20 2024–2025 → ZOR ERC-1155 2025–present)." That sentence is fully defensible and richer than either number alone.
Doc 051 links the OG Respect contract on
basescan.org (twice). That is wrong: the OG address 0x34cE…6957 does not exist
on Base (0 transfers, no token record on base.blockscout.com). OG Respect is deployed on
Optimism only. The Base links in doc 051 should be repointed to Optimism. (Flagged, not
edited here — doc 051 is a whitepaper doc; left for its owner / Zaal to correct.)
fractal-onchain-facts.json— the machine-readable result (weeks, spans, tx counts).verify-fractal-onchain.py— re-runnable, read-only (Blockscout, no key). Enumerates both tokens' full transfer history and unions the ISO weeks.
python3 verify-fractal-onchain.py # print the reconciled on-chain history
python3 verify-fractal-onchain.py > fractal-onchain-facts.json # refreshFeeds the doc 1201 ledger: the "Fractal weeks" row moves from needs-source to verified (on-chain settlement = 63 weeks; game count is the off-chain Discord record).