Skip to content

Conversation

arokem
Copy link
Collaborator

@arokem arokem commented Aug 20, 2024

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator Author

arokem commented Aug 20, 2024

Also, @tsalo proposes that we change desc-mean to desc-stat, which would gel more nicely with the functional derivatives BEP and @tsalo's own GLM derivatives BEP. If folks think that's agreeable, I can implement that here as well.

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Aug 20, 2024

Sorry I miscommunicated my idea. I mean stat-mean instead of desc-mean, as in BEP 012.

@arokem
Copy link
Collaborator Author

arokem commented Aug 20, 2024

Of course - thanks for setting me straight. I am actually not sure that it entirely makes sense for the use-case shown here, because we have desc-mean in contrast to desc-merged and while stat-mean makes sense, I am not sure that stat-merged does.

@PeerHerholz
Copy link
Member

Was the idea to only have stat- or desc- or could both be used, ie stat- for mean and desc- for merged given that the underlying data is obtained through different operations, one being a statistic while the other isn't?

Sorry if I missed something obvious.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants