BEP021: Electrophysiological Derivatives#1680
Conversation
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
|
I am closing this, because I do not expect to work on this, and nobody else seems to, either. Furthermore, we do not lose a lot of discussions or comments by closing this here. Whoever wants to continue this work may open a new PR from the |
|
Should we aslo remove the BEP from the listing of active BEP on the BIDS website? |
|
In my opinion yes, because it is not active, but I am no longer a moderator of that BEP. |
|
well, not active is sort of .. there are low hanging fruits in other derivative parts that needs sorted out before we can work again on that one |
|
|
wow ?? where is that coming from -- we are still working on it, testing solutions |
|
CPernet left a comment (bids-standard/bids-specification#1680)
wow ?? where is that coming from
Ah OK, happy to discuss if there are new developments. In Copenhagen, the main requirement for derivative EEG is simply to indicate whether the data are continuous or epoched (at a basic level), and this is already covered by the raw data flags and fields.
EEG derivatives would therefore be more closely tied to ICA, other metadata, source localization, and related outputs. ICA already has its own BEP. Source localization is important, but there is currently little momentum around it. One option would be to frame explicitly BEP for EEG derivative as a BEP focused on EEG source localization, which could help build momentum.
|
|
Well actually we also have a bunch of different transforms we have experimented with that I need to go though (aperiodic, instant phase etc .. ) along with alternative data representations. Unless everyone is in a rush I'd rather live it open, and then we encode it in derivatives properly (in the schema, rather than closing just like that) |
|
Fine with me
…On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 10:46 AM Cyril Pernet ***@***.***> wrote:
*CPernet* left a comment (bids-standard/bids-specification#1680)
<#1680 (comment)>
Well actually we also have a bunch of different transforms we have
experimented with that I need to go though (aperiodic, instant phase etc ..
) along with alternative data representations. Unless everyone is in a rush
I'd rather live it open, and then we encode it in derivatives properly (in
the schema, rather than closing just like that)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1680 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOJGQJYI3VHKJ2WLZ6VFPL4LDIW5AVCNFSM6AAAAACUO6QUVCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTQNZTGM2DAOBXHE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
wouldn't this also relate to other (peripheral) physiological derivatives? (attn @smoia and larger @bids-standard/bep045 ) |
@yarikoptic this is about EEG / MEG |
|
@CPernet |
5 participants
This PR aims to integrate BEP021 (Electrophysiological Derivatives) into the BIDS specification.
It is a work in progress (a draft PR). As a group we decided in several meetings that we might profit from taking the agreed upon aspects of the BEP in the Google Doc and formalizing them within this PR.
Please comment both in this thread, as well as with inline code reviews as to what you'd like to see changed / improved.
You are welcome to add changes directly via Pull Requests to this branch: https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specification/tree/bep021
My personal goal is to keep adding to this PR over the next days/weeks so that all applicable points from the BEP Google Doc are incorporated here.
To Do:
General Links:
Related PRs:
descriptions.tsvfile relating to thedesc-<label>entity #1613cc @christinerogers @CPernet @guiomar @robertoostenveld @arnodelorme @dorahermes