Skip to content

Update MIXS #1738

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
cthoyt merged 3 commits into from
Oct 29, 2025
Merged

Update MIXS #1738

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
62bae7f
Update MIXS
cthoyt Oct 28, 2025
94685b3
Update bioregistry.json
cthoyt Oct 28, 2025
03e3311
Update bioregistry.json
cthoyt Oct 28, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
26 changes: 19 additions & 7 deletions src/bioregistry/data/bioregistry.json
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -77639,12 +77639,12 @@
"prefix": "MIXS",
"version": "v6.2.0"
},
"comment": "Some things to be decided before granting - [ ] should the prefix be mixs, gsc.mixs, MIxS, MIXS, ...? - [ ] MIxS terms are most commonly identified by a short computable stable label, e.g ph_regm. The GSC CIG team are creating numeric identifiers, e.g. MIXS:0001056 - Should we support both schemes? - If we do, should these be different prefixes? I would strongly recommend this. E.g. mixs.term:ph_regm, mixs:0001056. We can then have different regex patterns for both Additional notes: - The http://gensc.org/ns/mixs/ will likely changes to a w3id.org URI that will also serve as a semweb identifier - It currently redirects to the tdwg wiki but this is I assume temporary",
"comment": "Some things to be decided before granting - [ ] should the prefix be mixs, gsc.mixs, MIxS, MIXS, ...? - [ ] MIxS terms are most commonly identified by a short computable stable label, e.g ph_regm. The GSC CIG team are creating numeric identifiers, e.g. MIXS:0001056 - Should we support both schemes? - If we do, should these be different prefixes? I would strongly recommend this. E.g. mixs.term:ph_regm, mixs:0001056. We can then have different regex patterns for both Additional notes: - It currently redirects to the tdwg wiki but this is I assume temporary",
"contact": {
"email": "rlwalls2008@gmail.com",
"github": "ramonawalls",
"name": "Ramona Walls",
"orcid": "0000-0001-8815-0078"
"email": "mam@lbl.gov",
"github": "turbomam",
"name": "Mark Andrew Miller",
"orcid": "0000-0001-9076-6066"
},
"contributor": {
"email": "cjmungall@lbl.gov",
Expand All @@ -77664,9 +77664,16 @@
"github": "lnanderson",
"name": "Lindsey N. Anderson",
"orcid": "0000-0002-8741-7823"
},
{
"email": "mam@lbl.gov",
"github": "turbomam",
"name": "Mark Andrew Miller",
"orcid": "0000-0001-9076-6066"
}
],
"description": "The GSC family of minimum information standards (checklists) – Minimum Information about any (x) Sequence (MIxS). MIxS identifiers are for terms describing an aspect of an environmental sample.",
"download_owl": "https://w3id.org/mixs/mixs.owl.ttl",
"example": "0001056",
"fairsharing": {
"abbreviation": "MIxS",
Expand All @@ -77684,14 +77691,15 @@
"subjects": []
},
"github_request_issue": 151,
"homepage": "https://www.gensc.org/pages/standards/all-terms.html",
"homepage": "https://w3id.org/mixs",
"mappings": {
"aberowl": "MIXS",
"bioportal": "MIXS",
"fairsharing": "FAIRsharing.9aa0zp"
},
"name": "Minimal Information about any Sequence",
"name": "Minimum Information about any (x) Sequence",
"pattern": "^\\d{7}$",
"preferred_prefix": "MIXS",
"providers": [
{
"code": "github",
Expand All @@ -77710,6 +77718,10 @@
"year": 2011
}
],
"rdf_uri_format": "https://w3id.org/mixs/$1",
"references": [
"https://github.com/biopragmatics/bioregistry/pull/1738"
],
"reviewer": {
"email": "cthoyt@gmail.com",
"github": "cthoyt",
Expand Down
Loading