Refactor contract in Reactant integration to use dot_general and test it
#268
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mofeing
changed the title
contract in Reactant integration and test it
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #268 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 79.59% 0.04% -79.55%
==========================================
Files 32 32
Lines 2068 2144 +76
==========================================
- Hits 1646 1 -1645
- Misses 422 2143 +1721 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…duct, manual and with multiple tensors
mofeing
changed the title
contract in Reactant integration and test itcontract in Reactant integration to use dot_general and test it
Closed
jofrevalles
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
stablehlo.einsumis deprecated.stablehlo.unary_einsumwas deprecated and it's already removed, so we don't have any replacement right now but we will be able to write sth in the future based onstablehlo.reduceonce the Ops is implemented.