Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid computing the norm on normalization of a Canonical MPS #338

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 11, 2025

Conversation

mofeing
Copy link
Member

@mofeing mofeing commented Mar 6, 2025

This should speed up normalize! on a Canonical MPS

@mofeing mofeing requested a review from jofrevalles March 7, 2025 09:00
@mofeing mofeing added the performance Makes the code go "brrrr" label Mar 7, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 64.69%. Comparing base (b8f1b04) to head (44c236a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #338       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   51.10%   64.69%   +13.59%     
===========================================
  Files          36       34        -2     
  Lines        2403     2504      +101     
===========================================
+ Hits         1228     1620      +392     
+ Misses       1175      884      -291     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mofeing
Copy link
Member Author

mofeing commented Mar 7, 2025

All tests pass both in Julia 1.10 & 1.11 on my laptop... don't know why it fails on GitHub runners.

@mofeing mofeing merged commit 6753076 into master Mar 11, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@mofeing mofeing deleted the feature/normalize-for-canonical branch March 11, 2025 08:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
performance Makes the code go "brrrr"
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants