-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
test depends on url #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This commit stops using GITHUB_TOKEN in git-tool for better security.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @bukepo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request is a test, primarily focused on validating the Depends-On functionality as indicated in its title and description. The accompanying code change is a minimal, non-functional addition intended to trigger a build or test pipeline, rather than introducing a substantive feature or fix.
Highlights
- Test Purpose: The primary intent of this pull request appears to be to test the
Depends-Onlinking functionality, as indicated by the PR title "test depends on url" and theDepends-Ontag in the description. This suggests it's a test PR for CI/CD or dependency tracking. - Code Modification: A seemingly arbitrary 100-byte
chararray namedmUnusedwas added as a member variable to theMleclass definition insrc/core/thread/mle.hppat line 2301. This change does not appear to have any functional impact on the codebase and likely serves as a minimal modification to trigger a build or test.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request appears to be for testing a 'Depends-On' integration, as indicated by the title and description. The only code change is the addition of a 100-byte unused character array to the Mle class. My review feedback focuses on this code change. While this change might serve its testing purpose, it introduces an unused variable that increases memory consumption and should not be merged into the production codebase. I have left a specific comment with a suggestion to remove it.
| RouterRoleRestorer mRouterRoleRestorer; | ||
| RouterRoleTransition mRouterRoleTransition; | ||
| Ip6::Netif::UnicastAddress mLeaderAloc; | ||
| char mUnused[100]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change adds an unused member variable mUnused to the Mle class.
While this may be intended for testing purposes as suggested by the PR title, adding an unused variable to a core class like Mle has negative impacts:
- Increased Memory Footprint: It adds 100 bytes to the size of every
Mleinstance. In a resource-constrained embedded environment like OpenThread, this is a significant and unnecessary overhead. - Reduced Maintainability: The presence of unused code, especially with a name like
mUnused, can be confusing for future developers and adds clutter to the codebase.
For these reasons, this line should be removed before merging.
b693c15 to
6e1a6ff
Compare
test
Depends-On: openthread/ot-nrf528xx#989