Skip to content

Change license to Apache 2.0 #997

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

demirkayaender
Copy link
Contributor

What changed?

Why?

How did you test it?

Potential risks

Release notes

Documentation Changes

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
[submodule "src/main/idls"]
path = src/main/idls
url = [email protected]:uber/cadence-idl.git
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

did you mean to change this? This should be git@ as far as I'm aware

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is that a java thing? Why should it be git@? All the other ones are using this format and it seems to be working.
This also seems to be working to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it refs to the git cloning option, by default git uses SSH as a transport protocol, but you can use HTTP as well, though it's a bit less well supported.
Screenshot 2025-05-05 at 7 54 13 PM

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably adopt a standard for this across our repos. AFAICT both of them are working and all the other repos use this one. We can switch to the other one in case this breaks in the future.

@demirkayaender demirkayaender merged commit aaf9d1d into cadence-workflow:master May 6, 2025
7 checks passed
@demirkayaender demirkayaender deleted the java-client-license branch May 6, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants