Skip to content

Active-active exploration/prototyping #6724

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Active-active exploration/prototyping #6724

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

taylanisikdemir
Copy link
Member

What changed?
Adding bunch of logs and running failover simulation to make active-active domain mode work.
A lot of hacks/if conditions to make it work for test-domain.
This PR will be discarded once the open questions are answered and follow up PRs will be sent for actual implementation.

@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir force-pushed the taylan/active_active_skeleton branch 2 times, most recently from 2b7adce to 8deb4fe Compare March 11, 2025 20:40
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir force-pushed the taylan/active_active_skeleton branch 2 times, most recently from 479dc42 to fdd2f80 Compare March 21, 2025 22:47
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir force-pushed the taylan/active_active_skeleton branch 3 times, most recently from 5ad8d40 to b296bcc Compare April 4, 2025 16:30
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir force-pushed the taylan/active_active_skeleton branch from b296bcc to 139d56c Compare April 7, 2025 06:33
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir force-pushed the taylan/active_active_skeleton branch from 139d56c to ac8206d Compare April 7, 2025 08:33
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir mentioned this pull request Apr 10, 2025
Merged
@taylanisikdemir taylanisikdemir changed the title Active-active hacky exploration/prototyping Active-active exploration/prototyping Apr 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Shaddoll Shaddoll Awaiting requested review from Shaddoll Shaddoll will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Shaddoll is a code owner

@neil-xie neil-xie Awaiting requested review from neil-xie neil-xie will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review neil-xie is a code owner

@davidporter-id-au davidporter-id-au Awaiting requested review from davidporter-id-au davidporter-id-au will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review davidporter-id-au is a code owner

@Groxx Groxx Awaiting requested review from Groxx Groxx will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review Groxx is a code owner

@shijiesheng shijiesheng Awaiting requested review from shijiesheng shijiesheng will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review shijiesheng is a code owner

@jakobht jakobht Awaiting requested review from jakobht jakobht will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review jakobht is a code owner

@3vilhamster 3vilhamster Awaiting requested review from 3vilhamster 3vilhamster will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review 3vilhamster is a code owner

@sankari165 sankari165 Awaiting requested review from sankari165 sankari165 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review sankari165 is a code owner

@dkrotx dkrotx Awaiting requested review from dkrotx dkrotx will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review dkrotx is a code owner

@demirkayaender demirkayaender Awaiting requested review from demirkayaender demirkayaender will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review demirkayaender is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@taylanisikdemir