Skip to content

Reduce payload size #21093

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Reduce payload size #21093

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hariombalhara
Copy link
Member

@hariombalhara hariombalhara commented May 3, 2025

What does this PR do?

Reduce payload size in dry run response

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2025

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Reduce payload size". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 3, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
cal ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 3, 2025 3:45am
calcom-web-canary ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 3, 2025 3:45am

@keithwillcode keithwillcode added core area: core, team members only enterprise area: enterprise, audit log, organisation, SAML, SSO labels May 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 3, 2025

E2E results are ready!

@hariombalhara hariombalhara marked this pull request as ready for review May 3, 2025 03:45
@hariombalhara hariombalhara requested a review from a team as a code owner May 3, 2025 03:45
@graphite-app graphite-app bot requested a review from a team May 3, 2025 03:45
Copy link

@mrge-io mrge-io bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mrge reviewed 1 file and found no issues. Review this PR in mrge.io.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented May 3, 2025

Graphite Automations

"Add consumer team as reviewer" took an action on this PR • (05/03/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

Copy link
Member

@zomars zomars left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hariombalhara Can we add a unit test with the expected snapshot?

@github-actions github-actions bot marked this pull request as draft May 3, 2025 04:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core area: core, team members only enterprise area: enterprise, audit log, organisation, SAML, SSO ready-for-e2e
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants