Update to latest libraries#3
Open
iay wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
The update to RadioLib 6.0.0 introduced two important changes: * Requirement to explicitly indicate signal change direction in setGdo0Action * Need to suppress preamble quality threshold because of position of sync word Ideally, the latter would be solved by using a sync word which immediately follows the preamble, but the option used here keeps the previous behaviour.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The update to RadioLib 6.0.0 introduced two important changes:
Ideally, the latter would be solved by using a sync word which immediately follows the preamble, but the option used here keeps the previous behaviour with minimal changes.
I raised a (now closed) issue on RadioLib when I was trying to figure out why updating it to 6.0.0 didn't work:
jgromes/RadioLib#1634
I might look into picking a new sync word later, as my plan is to use this code as a basis for something a bit more complicated: I have a receiver which appears to respond to switch pushes and I'd like to monitor that, so having the full packet available is probably a good idea. That's going to require digging the SDR out of the drawer and reproducing your setup from the video, so this seemed like a good first step.