Skip to content

Conversation

@tobe2098
Copy link
Contributor

Adjustments to previous PR #4438.

@tobe2098 tobe2098 self-assigned this Oct 24, 2025
@tobe2098 tobe2098 requested a review from ricab October 24, 2025 16:00
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.46%. Comparing base (d5284b2) to head (b4f4d6d).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4477   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.46%   89.46%           
=======================================
  Files         240      240           
  Lines       13829    13831    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        12372    12374    +2     
  Misses       1457     1457           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sharder996 sharder996 self-requested a review October 24, 2025 16:23
Copy link
Collaborator

@ricab ricab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, thank you @tobe2098!

[secondary]

@ricab
Copy link
Collaborator

ricab commented Oct 24, 2025

Oh the category should be [image-host] in the commit message.e

@tobe2098 tobe2098 changed the title [feature] Dynamic snapcraft filters [image-host] Dynamic snapcraft filters Oct 24, 2025
@tobe2098 tobe2098 force-pushed the feature/dynamic-snapcraft-filter branch from f4e6cce to 4c8efdb Compare October 24, 2025 16:58
@tobe2098 tobe2098 force-pushed the feature/dynamic-snapcraft-filter branch from 4c8efdb to b4f4d6d Compare October 25, 2025 09:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants