Fix vale

[seb4stien]

Fix vale issues.

[erinecon]

Thanks!

[seb4stien]

Juju 3.x seems to do the job indeed. And using the backticks on the version too: Juju 3.
@erinecon any recommendation on what we should align on?

[erinecon]

Juju 3.x seems to do the job indeed. And using the backticks on the version too: Juju 3. @erinecon any recommendation on what we should align on?

Hi @seb4stien , I would use Juju 3.x

[erinecon]

Hi @seb4stien,

For transparency, I fixed some initial discourse-gatekeeper failures by converting all the Discourse posts to Wiki articles.

Now the failure is:

problem: detected unmerged community contributions, these need to be resolved before proceeding.  
Paths with potentially unmerged community contributions: {'tutorial/testing-netbox', 'explanation/charm-architecture', 
'tutorial/getting-started', 'how-to/contribute', 'how-to/configure-saml'}.

I recommend that you compare the relevant Discourse posts with the changes in this PR and make sure they match. Then you can re-trigger the workflow, and it should pass.

[github-actions]

Test results for commit a2dd5e3

Test coverage for a2dd5e3

Name           Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
----------------------------------------------------------
src/charm.py       7      1      2      1    78%   20
----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL              7      1      2      1    78%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2025-07-15 15:12:02.668300

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 671
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 1
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):