process: add docs for adding readonly request access

[v9n]

Define an initial process to submit read-only ip access

[isegall-da]

Thanks @v9n
This seems to be duplicating quite a lot of stuff from the process above it, WDYT of just adding the missing points to the existing text instead?

[v9n]

Thanks @v9n This seems to be duplicating quite a lot of stuff from the process above it, WDYT of just adding the missing points to the existing text instead?

They looks similar on the steps today, but the context is quite different IMHO.

• One is the first time someone setup validator. They are new and just want to get a validator up. They won't deal with anything else yet.

• Other is when they already know some stuff around and now adding the read-only. By this time someone does the read only ip, they have more experience as well and we can keep the docs short and simple and less hand holding but more on policy.

I think let keep it separate, so we don't confused a newly user that is spinning up a validator. So we can keep that part clear, conscice and to the point. Adding less noise to that part is better.

[hythloda]

@v9n Can you make the changes directly?

[v9n]

Hi @hythloda What change do I need to make to get this PR merge? I think Ital want some changes but I provided my though. let me ask Ital again.

Hi @isegall-da Do you think this is good? or you still want to merge the section and insert the part where they are different?

[isegall-da]

Suggested change

Unlike validator IPs, read-only access IP addresses can be reused across all network environments (**Dev**, **Test**, and **Main**).

Outdated, that's allowed for validator IPs now too

[isegall-da]

Suggested change

	"<org-name> / <operator-name-or-sponsor-name>" : [
	"ip1/32",
	"ip2/32"
	]
	```
	When the organization runs the node themselves, list the sponsor in the second part after the dash (/).
	"<org-name> / <sponsor-name>" : [
	"ip1/32",
	"ip2/32"
	]

[isegall-da]

@v9n If you're fine with my proposed changes, can you just accept and we'll merge? I think it's good enough.