You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Full results behind the evaluation on our SfN 2026 poster (PSTR339.15, "Conversational AI agents for converting neurophysiology data to NWB and reanalyzing the DANDI Archive").
We repeated one of our past conversions, the Lerner Lab's photometry and optogenetics data from Seiler et al. (2022), and graded each run against our published conversion, DANDI:000971 (152 subjects, 3,986 sessions). Claude Code ran in a fresh Docker container per run, with no route to GitHub or the DANDI Archive, and uploaded its conversion to the DANDI sandbox. The skill arms had the nwb-convert skill; the vanilla arms had Claude Code alone. A simulated lab scientist (Claude Opus 5.5 with the lab's fact sheet) answered only what the agent asked. Each arm ran once, from the same opening prompt.
Agent models: Claude Opus 4.5 (claude-opus-4-5-20251101) and Claude Opus 5.5 (claude-opus-5-5). Two reference sessions where our conversion used another mouse's run are left out of every row.
Coverage
Metadata items is the mean, over the 49 items the reference fills, of the share of matched sessions where the run fills the item; the items are listed under Metadata items below.
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Subjects (of 152)
55%
55%
99%
100%
Sessions (of 3,986)
19%
40%
99%
99%
Photometry stream (of 63 sessions)
83%
98%
97%
100%
Behavior stream (of 3,986 sessions)
19%
40%
99%
99%
Optogenetics stream (of 2,120 sessions)
0%
0%
99%
99%
Western blot images (of 16)
0%
100%
0%
100%
Metadata items (of 49)
48%
53%
92%
98%
Data fidelity
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Photometry samples identical to reference
100%
100%
100%
100%
Behavior event times match reference
88.3%
97.3%
99.5%
100%
Rewards at nosepoke times
88%
100%
100%
100%
Paired rewards at light onsets
53%
100%
100%
100%
Omission rewards not at nosepokes
100%
100%
99%
100%
Synchronization error, median
0 ms
0 ms
14 ms
13 ms
Photometry chunked and compressed
0%
100%
100%
100%
NWB Inspector (DANDI configuration)
Distinct issues: Inspector messages with the same check, neurodata type and object path count once, however many files they appear in.
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Critical issues
0
0
0
0
Best-practice violations
4
1
0
0
Timestamps not ascending
3
0
0
0
Regular timestamps stored explicitly
1
1
0
0
Best-practice suggestions
0
3
2
7
Missing description
0
2
0
0
Single-row table
0
1
2
5
All-NaN column
0
0
0
1
Non-standard processing module name
0
0
0
1
Duplicate object identifiers
0
69
0
0
Edge cases
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Should be converted: No subject ID, MED-PC file in mouse folder
20/575
221/575
575/575
573/575
Should be converted: Photometry restarted mid-session
0/3
0/3
0/3
3/3
Should be converted: Mouse ran the wrong program first
2/2
2/2
2/2
2/2
Should be skipped: MED-PC run in the wrong mouse’s file
3/3
0/3
3/3
3/3
Should be skipped: Mice missing from the demographics sheet
5/15
12/15
15/15
15/15
Should be skipped: No subject ID, MED-PC file sorted by date
11/11
11/11
11/11
11/11
Should be skipped: Corrupted photometry
1/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
Neurodata types
Share of what each run converted that is stored in the preferred type (NWB schema 2.11.0, ndx-fiber-photometry 0.2.3, ndx-optogenetics 0.4.0).
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Photometry in FiberPhotometryResponseSeries
100%
100%
100%
100%
Behavior in EventsTable
0%
4%
100%
100%
Optogenetics in ndx-optogenetics tables
–
–
0%
100%
Photometry metadata in preferred types
100%
0%
100%
100%
Optogenetics metadata in preferred types
–
–
0%
100%
Ontology identifiers
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Terms with a correct identifier (of 11)
0%
0%
0%
91%
Species (NCBITaxon)
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
Strain (RRID)
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
Institution (ROR)
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
Experimenters (ORCID)
0/6
0/6
0/6
6/6
Brain regions (Allen atlas, UBERON)
0/2
0/2
0/2
1/2
Dandiset metadata
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Items matching our Dandiset (of 25)
12%
12%
24%
92%
Authors, in order, with ORCID and affiliation
0/8
0/8
1/8
8/8
Data collectors
0/4
0/4
0/4
4/4
Funders with award numbers
0/3
0/3
0/3
3/3
Anatomy and disorder terms
0/3
0/3
0/3
2/3
Related links, license and text fields
3/7
3/7
5/7
6/7
Metadata items
Share of matched sessions where the run fills each item the reference fills. A dash means the run matched no reference session with the item.
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
subject: sex
100%
100%
100%
100%
subject: species
100%
100%
100%
100%
subject: age
100%
100%
100%
100%
subject: genotype
0%
100%
100%
100%
subject: strain
0%
100%
100%
100%
subject: description
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: session_description
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: experimenter
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: institution
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: lab
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: keywords
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: related_publications
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: experiment_description
100%
100%
100%
100%
session: surgery
0%
0%
100%
100%
session: virus
0%
0%
100%
0%
indicator (jGCaMP7b)
100%
100%
100%
100%
virus (AAV5-CAG-FLEX-jGCaMP7b)
0%
100%
100%
100%
injection sites (medial and lateral SNc)
0%
0%
100%
100%
fiber locations (DMS and DLS)
100%
100%
100%
100%
injection coordinates (AP -3.1; ML 0.8 / 1.3; DV -4.7 / -4.2)
0%
0%
100%
100%
fiber coordinates (DMS AP 0.8 ML 1.5 DV -2.8; DLS AP -0.1 ML 2.8 DV -3.5)
0%
0%
100%
100%
fiber core diameter (400 um)
0%
0%
100%
100%
fiber numerical aperture (0.48)
0%
0%
100%
100%
excitation wavelengths (465 and 405 nm)
0%
0%
97%
100%
emission wavelength (about 525 nm)
83%
0%
97%
100%
photodetector (Newport femtowatt photoreceiver)
83%
0%
0%
100%
LED modulation frequencies (211/330/450/270 Hz)
0%
0%
97%
100%
filters and dichroic (Doric FMC4 minicube)
83%
0%
0%
100%
effector (ChR2)
100%
100%
100%
100%
effector (NpHR)
100%
–
100%
100%
effector (EYFP control)
100%
100%
100%
100%
light wavelength (460 nm)
0%
0%
100%
100%
light wavelength (625 nm)
0%
–
100%
100%
light power (15 mW)
0%
0%
100%
100%
pulse width (5 ms)
0%
0%
0%
100%
pulse frequency (20 Hz)
0%
0%
100%
100%
train duration (1 s)
0%
100%
100%
100%
stimulation site (DMS)
100%
100%
100%
100%
stimulation site (DLS)
98%
100%
100%
100%
stimulation coordinates (DMS AP 0.8 ML 1.5 DV -2.8)
0%
0%
100%
100%
stimulation coordinates (DLS AP -0.1 ML 2.8 DV -3.5)
0%
0%
100%
99%
virus injection site (SNc)
100%
100%
100%
100%
virus injection coordinates (AP -3.1 ML 0.8 DV -4.7, medial SNc)
0%
0%
100%
100%
virus injection coordinates (AP -3.1 ML 1.3 DV -4.2, lateral SNc)
0%
0%
100%
99%
virus (ChR2, NpHR or EYFP construct)
0%
100%
100%
100%
light source (Prizmatix)
0%
0%
100%
100%
MED-PC program
100%
100%
100%
100%
box number
0%
0%
0%
100%
event descriptions (what nosepoke, port entry and reward events mean)
99%
100%
100%
100%
Example notebook
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Notebook written
no
no
no
yes
Session checks
A mangled subject ID reads as the same number (121.28 for 121.280) or keeps only the part before the dot (239 for 239.388). These sessions count as missing under Coverage.
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Start time within 1 s of the reference
0.0%
95.9%
98.4%
98.4%
Start time more than 5 min off
96.8%
2.0%
0.7%
0.7%
Of those, a wrong UTC offset
243
0
0
0
Missing sessions converted under a mangled subject ID
153
542
0
0
Sessions written to more than one file
17
71
2
3
Metadata values (share of files)
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Paper DOI in related_publications
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
All seven authors, in order, as experimenters
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Subject age at least 10 weeks
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Process
Opus 4.5 vanilla
Opus 4.5 skill
Opus 5.5 vanilla
Opus 5.5 skill
Messages asking the scientist
0
3
2
7
Conversion time
0.6 h
1.4 h
0.6 h
2.3 h
Upload time (DANDI sandbox)
3.6 h
3.2 h
3.6 h
4.8 h
Input tokens
24.6 M
24.0 M
31.5 M
99.0 M
Output tokens
78 k
94 k
124 k
314 k
Lines of Python written
1,623
1,228
1,515
4,511
About
Full results of the nwb-convert benchmark shown on our SfN 2026 poster