Skip to content

Fgcz sync automation folder restructuring#37

Open
mcarrara-bioinfo wants to merge 4 commits intofgcz_sync_automationfrom
fgcz_sync_automation_folder_restructuring
Open

Fgcz sync automation folder restructuring#37
mcarrara-bioinfo wants to merge 4 commits intofgcz_sync_automationfrom
fgcz_sync_automation_folder_restructuring

Conversation

@mcarrara-bioinfo
Copy link
Collaborator

Adapted the process to follow the new folder structure on Euler.
Side note: configured the sync to https mode for better stability

Copy link
Collaborator

@kirschen-k kirschen-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I just noted that 2 batches are missing in the badlist in fgcz.conf and was wondering why?

#retries=10
# mark bad runs
badlist=MiSeq_210122_MS562_o23881_DataDelivery,Fastqc_53742_2021-01-27--15-56-09,MiSeq_210129_MS564_o23775_DataDelivery,NOV657_COV19_o24384,MiSeq_210317_MS586_ww_o24329_o24329_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20210806_NOV873_o25679_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20210806_NOV873_o25697_DataDelivery,Fastqc_64627_2021-12-19--17-54-32,Fastqc_64710_2021-12-22--11-02-11,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27040_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o26977,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27023,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27026,Fastqc_64771_2021-12-25--11-15-42,Fastqc_64774_2021-12-25--11-17-46,Fastqc_64703_2021-12-22--10-58-32,Fastqc_64706_2021-12-22--11-00-41,Fastqc_64636_2021-12-19--17-58-55,Fastqc_64713_2021-12-22--11-03-19,Fastqc_64777_2021-12-25--11-19-09,Fastqc_64630_2021-12-19--17-56-31,Fastqc_64780_2021-12-25--11-20-17,Fastqc_64633_2021-12-19--17-57-51,NovaSeq_20221007_NOV1461_o29645_DataDelivery,o34397_NextSeq_240301_NS2k-272,o34397_Fastqc_2024-03-03--23-31-04,o34397_FastqScreen_2024-03-03--23-31-24,o34220_NextSeq_240216_NS2k-265,o34220_Fastqc_2024-02-19--15-50-33,o34220_FastqScreen_2024-02-19--15-50-53,o34676_Fastqc_2024-04-08--09-00-47,o34676_FastqScreen_2024-04-08--09-01-56,o34676_NovaSeq_240405_NOV1970,o35541_Aviti_2023-10-22_AV013,o36056_Aviti_240816_AV021,o39115_Aviti_250722_AV108,o39115_Aviti_250711_AV105
badlist=MiSeq_210122_MS562_o23881_DataDelivery,Fastqc_53742_2021-01-27--15-56-09,MiSeq_210129_MS564_o23775_DataDelivery,NOV657_COV19_o24384,MiSeq_210317_MS586_ww_o24329_o24329_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20210806_NOV873_o25679_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20210806_NOV873_o25697_DataDelivery,Fastqc_64627_2021-12-19--17-54-32,Fastqc_64710_2021-12-22--11-02-11,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27040_DataDelivery,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o26977,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27023,NovaSeq_20211217_NOV1084_o27026,Fastqc_64771_2021-12-25--11-15-42,Fastqc_64774_2021-12-25--11-17-46,Fastqc_64703_2021-12-22--10-58-32,Fastqc_64706_2021-12-22--11-00-41,Fastqc_64636_2021-12-19--17-58-55,Fastqc_64713_2021-12-22--11-03-19,Fastqc_64777_2021-12-25--11-19-09,Fastqc_64630_2021-12-19--17-56-31,Fastqc_64780_2021-12-25--11-20-17,Fastqc_64633_2021-12-19--17-57-51,NovaSeq_20221007_NOV1461_o29645_DataDelivery,o34397_NextSeq_240301_NS2k-272,o34397_Fastqc_2024-03-03--23-31-04,o34397_FastqScreen_2024-03-03--23-31-24,o34220_NextSeq_240216_NS2k-265,o34220_Fastqc_2024-02-19--15-50-33,o34220_FastqScreen_2024-02-19--15-50-53,o34676_Fastqc_2024-04-08--09-00-47,o34676_FastqScreen_2024-04-08--09-01-56,o34676_NovaSeq_240405_NOV1970,o35541_Aviti_2023-10-22_AV013,o36056_Aviti_240816_AV021
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are batches "o39115_Aviti_250722_AV108,o39115_Aviti_250711_AV105" missing?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Those are the two batches that we need to merge: 250722 and 250711, so they are not supposed to be in the badlist, as we saw together last month.
However, they still were included in the badlist in the config file on the remote. When I pushed the changes it also updated the config file

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants