Skip to content

Conversation

@cmwaters
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @cmwaters, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the metadata for Celestia Improvement Proposal (CIP) 42. The change specifically moves the proposal's status from 'Draft' to 'Review', signifying its progression in the CIP lifecycle and readiness for broader community feedback and evaluation.

Highlights

  • CIP-042 Status Update: The status field for CIP-042.md has been changed from Draft to Review. This indicates that CIP-042 is now ready for community review.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates the status of CIP-42 from 'Draft' to 'Review'. This change is appropriate for a meta-CIP whose dependent proposals are already under review or finalized.

While reviewing the file, I identified two minor opportunities to improve the document's consistency and usability. Since they are outside the scope of this change, you may consider addressing them in a follow-up pull request:

  • Specific Discussion Link: The discussions-to link on line 6 points to the generic forum homepage. It would be more helpful for readers if this linked directly to a specific discussion thread for CIP-42.
  • Consistent Casing: In the requires header on line 10, the reference to [cip-041] uses lowercase, while other CIPs are referenced in uppercase (e.g., [CIP-36]). Aligning this to [CIP-41] would improve consistency.

@rootulp rootulp merged commit 24dd0d4 into main Aug 28, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@jcstein jcstein deleted the cal/move-cip-42-to-review branch September 30, 2025 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants