Skip to content

Comments

docs: minor improvement for docs#387

Closed
huyejia wants to merge 1 commit intocelestiaorg:mainfrom
huyejia:main
Closed

docs: minor improvement for docs#387
huyejia wants to merge 1 commit intocelestiaorg:mainfrom
huyejia:main

Conversation

@huyejia
Copy link

@huyejia huyejia commented Feb 9, 2026

Overview

minor improvement for docs

Signed-off-by: huyejia <huyejia@outlook.jp>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @huyejia, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on minor textual refinements within the cip-026.md document. The changes aim to improve the precision and readability of explanations related to the ttl-num-blocks parameter adjustment and its impact on mempool behavior during the network upgrade.

Highlights

  • Documentation Clarity: Improved the wording in cips/cip-026.md to enhance clarity regarding the staged approach for ttl-num-blocks increase and the calculation of mempool duration.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • cips/cip-026.md
    • Updated a sentence to specify "This staged approach" for the ttl-num-blocks increase, emphasizing the phased implementation.
    • Revised the phrasing from "which closely matches" to "maintaining similar duration to" and replaced "times" with "×" in the calculation explanation for mempool duration.
Activity
  • No review activity or comments have been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request makes some minor improvements to the documentation in cip-026.md. The changes improve clarity and formatting. I've suggested one further minor wording improvement for even better readability. Overall, these are good changes that enhance the document.

@rootulp rootulp closed this Feb 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants