Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @jcstein, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces two new "skill" definitions to streamline development and documentation processes within the Celestia project. One skill provides detailed guidelines for maintaining the Celestia documentation site, ensuring consistency and accuracy. The other establishes a routing mechanism to direct broad Celestia tasks to the appropriate repository, clarifying ownership and preventing misdirected effort. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
🚀 Preview Deployment Your preview is ready: https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/pr-2427/ |
|
tested with Codex 5.4 extra-high:
|
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Stein <46639943+jcstein@users.noreply.github.com>
|
claude code opus 4.6: |
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
renaynay
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- utack on the link updates
- utack on sync skill
| - Example of Celestia's role in a rollup stack: | ||
| - https://docs.celestia.org/build/stacks/op-alt-da/introduction.md | ||
|
|
||
| Use this framing when helpful: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we expand the framing here to include information about fibre vs celestia main da protocol?
can we also include some usecases (why it makes sense) and generally why separating out data availability is beneficial?
| ## Repository routing | ||
|
|
||
| - Use `docs` repo for docs pages, tutorials, navigation, formatting, and link fixes. | ||
| - Use `celestia-node` for node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
blob submission, retrieval and verification api
There was a problem hiding this comment.
in place of "node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No sorry, I meant to add "use celestia-node for blob submission/retrieval + verification" rather than blob module internals. Sorry was unclear.
| - Use `docs` repo for docs pages, tutorials, navigation, formatting, and link fixes. | ||
| - Use `celestia-node` for node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation. | ||
| - Use `celestia-app` for chain/app behavior, modules, transaction/state behavior, and upgrade handlers. | ||
| - Use `celestia-core` for consensus-engine behavior and low-level networking/consensus internals. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can you please elaborate?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
consensus engine behaviour, transaction pool, and low-level networking/consensus internals.
| - Re-check method status if the target node version changes by reviewing `public/specs/openrpc-<version>.json` in this repo (served at `/specs/openrpc-<version>.json`) for deprecation notes. | ||
| - Use `/build/rpc/node-api/?version=v0.28.4` as the human-facing docs page, linking to the relevant package section when possible (for example `#blob`, `#state`, or `#p2p`). | ||
|
|
||
| - Submit with `blob.Submit` (preferred). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
should we add details how to submit directly to app node? (as least preferable lowest level route?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
as in how to send a signed tx to a consensus node?
Overview
Goal: SKILL.md should have an overview of how to post and retrieve blobs from Celestia.
Nice-to-have: turn node api into something consumable by the agents – automation that puts out the openrpc.json into SKILL.md – or at least the top methods.
We already have these:
https://github.com/celestiaorg/docs?tab=readme-ov-file#llm-and-agent-support
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
TODOs
go mod tidyran into replace errs./publicdirectorytest prompt