Skip to content

feat: add SKILL.md#2427

Open
jcstein wants to merge 23 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-celestia-skills
Open

feat: add SKILL.md#2427
jcstein wants to merge 23 commits intomainfrom
codex/add-celestia-skills

Conversation

@jcstein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jcstein jcstein commented Feb 20, 2026

Overview

Goal: SKILL.md should have an overview of how to post and retrieve blobs from Celestia.

  • these are best methods/practices
  • if submitting txs, this is how to

Nice-to-have: turn node api into something consumable by the agents – automation that puts out the openrpc.json into SKILL.md – or at least the top methods.

We already have these:
https://github.com/celestiaorg/docs?tab=readme-ov-file#llm-and-agent-support
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-node/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/blob/main/CLAUDE.md

TODOs

test prompt

I've downloaded this skill SKILL.md from Celestia website, a preview (use this as docs reference: https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/pr-2427/, not the production docs.celestia.org).

I want to build a PoC of a vanilla rollups on celestia DA. I want to prove we can post and retrieve blobs. I want all of it to be local to this project as if I am dockerizing it later as a service (not config/setup leakage to the user environment).

This rollup with be a ticker ping-pong (ping is a post, pong is a cofirmed retrieval from the chain).

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jcstein, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces two new "skill" definitions to streamline development and documentation processes within the Celestia project. One skill provides detailed guidelines for maintaining the Celestia documentation site, ensuring consistency and accuracy. The other establishes a routing mechanism to direct broad Celestia tasks to the appropriate repository, clarifying ownership and preventing misdirected effort.

Highlights

  • Docs Maintainer Skill: Introduced a comprehensive guide for maintaining Celestia documentation, covering structural rules, style guidelines, variable usage, directory intent, chain-id warnings, link rules, repository facts, and a workflow checklist.
  • Celestia Router Skill: Added a skill definition for routing Celestia-related tasks to the correct repositories (docs, celestia-app, celestia-node, cips), including decision rules, an intake checklist, handoff behavior, and safety considerations.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • SKILL.md
    • Added a new skill definition for Celestia documentation maintenance.
  • skills/celestia-router/SKILL.md
    • Added a new skill definition for routing Celestia tasks across repositories.
Activity
  • No activity has occurred on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

🚀 Preview Deployment

Your preview is ready: https://celestiaorg.github.io/docs-preview/pr-2427/

gemini-code-assist[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jcstein jcstein self-assigned this Feb 20, 2026
@jcstein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jcstein commented Mar 6, 2026

@jcstein jcstein changed the title feat: Add docs maintainer and Celestia router skills feat: add SKILL.md Mar 6, 2026
@jcstein jcstein marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2026 22:48
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jcstein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jcstein commented Apr 1, 2026

tested with Codex 5.4 extra-high:

Retest succeeded.

Using the same funded signer:

  • Address: celestia1fv6ch7v6d0n54zn3zp5un4e48ku5e5w9lqky55
  • Balance: 1000000utia
  • Submitted at height: 10728758
  • Retrieved payload: hello from codex

So the tested flow now works end-to-end with:

  • CELE_DA_URL=http://celestia-testnet-consensus.itrocket.net:26658
  • CELE_CORE_GRPC=rpc-mocha.pops.one:9090

That means the skill guidance is now grounded in a real successful Mocha submit/retrieve path, and the unfunded fallback guidance is also validated.

The final faucet-url edits are still local only. If you want, I can push those two last changes now.

jcstein and others added 2 commits April 1, 2026 09:45
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

jcstein added 2 commits April 1, 2026 18:59
Co-authored-by: Josh Stein <46639943+jcstein@users.noreply.github.com>
@jcstein
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

jcstein commented Apr 2, 2026

claude code opus 4.6:

~ % cd $HOME/code/test/celestia-blob && ./celestia-blob


Submitting blob: Hello from Celestia! Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:39:12Z

=== Blob submitted successfully! ===
  Height:     10734598
  Namespace:  30303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303664373935663734363537333734356636653733
  Commitment: a04f94dbc834f9947c3d09c7b2231419a6c2ecfe97afc31d9caffd1d3496537b

Retrieving blob...
Retrieved data: Hello from Celestia! Timestamp: 2026-04-02T01:39:12Z
Done!

blob tx: https://mocha.celenium.io/tx/30b18ed62f7843b2a1325096903e6f4f3db0db6ebb0a29eaee8cd3a0c16f218f?tab=messages

@jcstein jcstein requested a review from gbarros April 2, 2026 22:10
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

jcstein and others added 3 commits April 3, 2026 12:10
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

Co-authored-by: devin-ai-integration[bot] <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@renaynay renaynay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • utack on the link updates
  • utack on sync skill

- Example of Celestia's role in a rollup stack:
- https://docs.celestia.org/build/stacks/op-alt-da/introduction.md

Use this framing when helpful:
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we expand the framing here to include information about fibre vs celestia main da protocol?
can we also include some usecases (why it makes sense) and generally why separating out data availability is beneficial?

## Repository routing

- Use `docs` repo for docs pages, tutorials, navigation, formatting, and link fixes.
- Use `celestia-node` for node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

blob submission, retrieval and verification api

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in place of "node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation"?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No sorry, I meant to add "use celestia-node for blob submission/retrieval + verification" rather than blob module internals. Sorry was unclear.

- Use `docs` repo for docs pages, tutorials, navigation, formatting, and link fixes.
- Use `celestia-node` for node runtime/RPC behavior, blob module internals, DAS, p2p, and node implementation.
- Use `celestia-app` for chain/app behavior, modules, transaction/state behavior, and upgrade handlers.
- Use `celestia-core` for consensus-engine behavior and low-level networking/consensus internals.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mempool for celestia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you please elaborate?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

consensus engine behaviour, transaction pool, and low-level networking/consensus internals.

- Re-check method status if the target node version changes by reviewing `public/specs/openrpc-<version>.json` in this repo (served at `/specs/openrpc-<version>.json`) for deprecation notes.
- Use `/build/rpc/node-api/?version=v0.28.4` as the human-facing docs page, linking to the relevant package section when possible (for example `#blob`, `#state`, or `#p2p`).

- Submit with `blob.Submit` (preferred).
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we add details how to submit directly to app node? (as least preferable lowest level route?)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as in how to send a signed tx to a consensus node?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants