Skip to content

Conversation

@rafalop
Copy link

@rafalop rafalop commented Nov 28, 2023

api-int-lb-port: sets the load balancer serving port when a loadbalancer-internal relation is specified

api-ext-lb-port: sets the load balancer serving port when a loadbalancer-external relation is specified

These are primarily needed when the kubeapi-load-balancer app is deployed on the same host as either a kubernetes-control-plane or kubernetes-worker node, since the standard ports overlap with the balancer.

Fixes: LP#2042393
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-kubernetes-worker/+bug/2042393

addyess and others added 7 commits July 13, 2023 14:36
…-kubernetes#291)

* add cnis which no require privileged containers to the auto list

* resolve issue were cni relation may not cni-conf-file
* bump to cni 1.2.0 for k8s 1.27

* bump golang and script name to match upstream

* Build CNI with same golang as upstream (1.17)

* Test with juju 3.1 and python 3.10

* Use python-libjuju 3.1

* Drop juju 2.9 from test matrix

---------

Co-authored-by: Kevin W Monroe <[email protected]>
Required when using kube-proxy in ipvs mode
Fixes LP#2033682
…rnetes#301)

* Adds ipvs kernel modules to lxd profile

Required when using kube-proxy in ipvs mode
Fixes LP#2033682

* LXD profile for Calico required mount point /sys/fs/bpf
…rmed-kubernetes#302)

* Revert "LXD profile for Calico required mount point /sys/fs/bpf (charmed-kubernetes#301)"

This reverts commit 7239eb1.

* Update main.yml

Build integration tests charm with 3.x charm-tools

---------

Co-authored-by: Adam Dyess <[email protected]>
api-int-lb-port: sets the load balancer serving port when a
loadbalancer-internal relation is specified

api-ext-lb-port: sets the load balancer serving port when a
loadbalancer-external relation is specified

These are primarily needed when the kubeapi-load-balancer app is
deployed on the same host as either a kubernetes-control-plane or
kubernetes-worker node, since the standard ports overlap with the
balancer.

Fixes: LP#2042393

Signed-off-by: Rafael Lopez <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants