Skip to content

docs: Update chef-server-ctl restore documentation #3449

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lotooo
Copy link

@lotooo lotooo commented Sep 12, 2022

Description

Update documentation for chef-server-ctl restore

Issues Resolved

Use the proper file extention in the doc to match real life behavior.

It looks like the library is testing if file extention is .tgz and fails otherwise : https://github.com/chef/chef_backup/blob/main/lib/chef_backup/runner.rb#L78

Current behavior if you follow https://docs.chef.io/server/server_backup_restore/#examples :

[ERROR] /foo/bar/chef-backup-2022-09-12-07-04-33.tar.gz is not a valid backup

Check List

@lotooo lotooo requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2022 13:29
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 12, 2022

👷 Deploy Preview for chef-server processing.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4c13c6d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/chef-server/deploys/631f5b2a79a0010008666f8a

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Documentation Pulls PR onto docs board so they know it exists label Sep 12, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Pulls PR onto docs board so they know it exists
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants