Bug fixes to anatomical workflow#40
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (29.50%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #40 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 29.50% 29.50%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 61 61
=======================================
Hits 18 18
Misses 43 43 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
nx10
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good - we should switch from simplenamespace to namedtuples or dataclasses in subsequent PRs. Dynamic class creation isn't needed here.
|
Yah, lets chat more about that offline. I originally had it as a |
A couple of small bug fixes for the anatomical workflow (tested and confirmed working locally e2e).
fslmathscall - I think this changed in the most recentniwrapversionTests coming in separate PR.