-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Add basic support to build EC2 cloud images #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
yoctozepto
wants to merge
3
commits into
chimera-linux:master
Choose a base branch
from
yoctozepto:cloud-ec2
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| label: gpt | ||
| unit: sectors | ||
| first-lba: 2048 | ||
| name=boot, size=@BOOT_SIZE@, type=C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B | ||
| name=root |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@q66 Despite that I wrote just about aarch64, now also x86_64 gets the initramfs before this stage. It gets created whenever linux-lts is installed due to initramfs hooks. It was not the case even though the history suggests the same hook was installed (was it blocked from running?). Anyhow, that effort is partially wasted because the initramfs generator has no idea about the UUID of the block device for resume operations - it is going to miss it. Thus, I could skip installing linux-lts at rootfs level and postpone it till now (then get just one, proper build) - this is a bit ugly as it splits the pkg installation effort (also, as an alternative, the entire non-bootstrap part of pkgs could be installed on a loop device for sanity - although this introduces more complexity in the process) - or the previous behaviour could be restored - or else we simply decide to waste the original initramfs build and be fine with that (that's also an option). WDYT?