[Snyk] Security upgrade torch from 2.4.1 to 2.9.0 - #37
Conversation
…ilities The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-TORCH-13052971
|
Important Review skippedIgnore keyword(s) in the title. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @arthrod, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, addresses a security vulnerability by upgrading the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Looks like there are a few issues preventing this PR from being merged!
If you'd like me to help, just leave a comment, like Feel free to include any additional details that might help me get this PR into a better state. You can manage your notification settings |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request from Snyk upgrades torch from 2.4.1 to 2.9.0 to fix a security vulnerability. This is a positive change. However, as noted in the PR description, this upgrade appears to surface a dependency conflict with the dill package. I've added a comment recommending a fix for this conflict to ensure the project's dependencies remain consistent and functional.
| tokenizers==0.19.1 | ||
| tomlkit==0.13.2 | ||
| torch==2.4.1 | ||
| torch==2.9.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While this security upgrade for torch is important, the PR description includes a warning that indicates a dependency conflict: multiprocess 0.70.15 has requirement dill>=0.3.7, but you have dill 0.3.6.
This conflict can cause runtime errors when using the environment built from this requirements file. To resolve this, the dill package should be upgraded in this file to a version that satisfies the requirement (e.g., 0.3.7 or higher).
|
| Status | Scanner | Total (0) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source Security | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | See details |
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.
Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
examples/third_party/unsloth/requirements.txtImportant
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.