feat: add 5 Luxembourg source snapshots for priority-1 migration targets#89
Merged
TommiLindfors merged 1 commit intoJun 7, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: HirenGajjar <gajjarhiren111@gmail.com>
TommiLindfors
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2026
Contributor
TommiLindfors
left a comment
TommiLindfors
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excellent work, Hiren! 🎉
This is exactly the kind of thorough, methodical contribution that makes a real difference. I really appreciate:
- Verified HTML integrity — checking DOCTYPE, lang, and encoding is exactly the right approach
- Title extraction from actual HTML — not assumed, cross-checked with grep
- Clean YAML metadata — all 5 files consistent, correct fields, proper naming convention
- Source traceability — linking back to the original workflow-data PRs where these sources were researched
All 5 sources are high-value Priority 1 targets and this unblocks the assertion authoring work. CI passes cleanly. Merging now!
Contributor
|
Now that these 5 snapshots are in, the natural next step is issue #48 — creating assertion batches from captured snapshots. If you're interested in continuing this chain, that would be an amazing follow-up! The snapshots you just captured are exactly the inputs that issue needs. 🙌 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of issue #46 — volunteer source snapshot capture.
Adds HTML snapshots and metadata YAML files for 5 Luxembourg government sources identified as Priority 1 migration candidates in
docs/migration-candidates.md(PR #38).Context and approach
The migration tracking document (PR #38, closes #14) identified these 5 sources as Priority 1 — high confidence, source-backed, self-contained. Capturing their HTML snapshots is the prerequisite step before source records and assertion batches can be authored for each.
All 5 sources were previously researched and URL-verified during workflow-data contributions (#44, #47–50). This PR provides the archived page content that assertion authors will extract claims from.
What was done
Step 1 — Downloaded HTML pages
Used
curl -Lto download the French (/fr/) version of each page directly into the correct directory structure undersources/snapshots/html/lu/.Step 2 — Verified HTML integrity
Checked each file for valid
<!DOCTYPE HTML>,lang="fr", and UTF-8 encoding. All 5 files confirmed as real page content, not redirects or error pages.Step 3 — Extracted exact page titles
Ran
grep -o '<title>[^<]*</title>'against each HTML file to extract the exactbrowser tab title. Updated YAML files to match exactly — not assumed titles.
Step 4 — Created metadata YAML files
Created one
.ymlfile per HTML file following the template in issue #46:url— exact URL capturedcaptured_at— ISO 8601 datetimecapture_method: manual_downloadcaptured_by: contributor.HirenGajjarlanguage: frpage_title— verified against actual<title>tagFiles captured
cnap_lu/survivor-pension/pension-survie_fr.htmlcns_lu/death-funeral-costs/deces-frais-funeraires_fr.htmlguichet_lu/funeral-allowance/indemnite-funeraire_fr.htmlguichet_lu/succession-declaration/declaration-succession_fr.htmlguichet_lu/bereavement-leave/conge-extraordinaire_fr.htmlWhy these 5 sources
These map directly to missing graph records identified in the migration tracking document:
source.cnap_lu.survivor_pension+ assertion batch. CNAP source currently partial in graph (survivor pension consequence exists via guichet source but no standalone CNAP record).source.cns_lu.death_notification. CNS funeral allowance chain has no equivalent in graph yet.indemnité funéraire) not yet modelled in the consequence graph.Source traceability
Verified
<!DOCTYPE HTML>,lang="fr", UTF-8<title>tags in HTML0a<slug>_<language>.html/<slug>_<language>.ymlgit commit -s)