utils.HTTP (patch) add response headers to output

[jirihofman]

• add response headers to output
• add tests

Before

After

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • HTTP actions now include comprehensive response header data, enhancing clarity and context when communicating with web services.
  • New dependencies added to enhance development capabilities: content-type, axios, and qs.

• Tests

  • Introduced a new test suite to validate the functionality of the HTTP response processing, ensuring accurate handling of response headers.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the project's dependencies and HTTP handling logic. The package.json file now includes three new development dependencies. The HTTP module in the appmixer has been refined by updating its version and modifying the response processing to include actual HTTP response headers. Additionally, a new test file has been added to validate that the updated HTTP response parsing functions correctly.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
package.json	Added "content-type": "^1.0.4", "axios": "^0.22.0", and "qs": "^6.10.1" to the devDependencies section without modifying the existing sinon dependency.
src/appmixer/utils/http/{bundle.json, http-commons.js}	In bundle.json, updated version from "1.4.3" to "1.4.4" and added a changelog entry for response headers; in http-commons.js, modified processResponse to initialize headers with the actual response headers.
test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js	Introduced a new test file using Mocha and Sinon to validate that processResponse accurately parses and returns the expected HTTP response, including headers.

Possibly related PRs

• Utils. Https. Put/POST improving headers #442: The changes in the main PR, which involve updating the processResponse function to correctly handle HTTP response headers, are related to the retrieved PR that enhances header processing in HTTP PUT and POST requests, as both address the handling of headers in HTTP operations.

Suggested reviewers

• vtalas

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 77c70b6 and 7843e90.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)

src/appmixer/utils/http/http-commons.js (1)

4-4: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix the pipeline failure by adding the 'qs' module.

The pipeline is failing with an error: "Cannot find module 'qs'". The module is imported here but not included in package.json.

Add 'qs' to the dependencies in package.json:

"dependencies": {
    "ip-address": "^10.0.1",
+   "qs": "^6.11.0"
}

🧰 Tools

🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI

[error] 4-4: Error: Cannot find module 'qs'.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js (1)

7-7: Remove duplicate import.

This line is redundant as axios is already imported on line 3.

-require('axios');

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0afb91 and 4a2f07b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• package.json (1 hunks)
• src/appmixer/utils/http/bundle.json (2 hunks)
• src/appmixer/utils/http/http-commons.js (1 hunks)
• test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

`**/*/bundle.json`: Every pull request should include changes to the related `bundle.json` file. This file contains version information, so all changes must also include a version ...

**/*/bundle.json: Every pull request should include changes to the related bundle.json file. This file contains version information, so all changes must also include a version update.

• src/appmixer/utils/http/bundle.json

🪛 GitHub Actions: Node.js CI

src/appmixer/utils/http/http-commons.js

[error] 4-4: Error: Cannot find module 'qs'.

test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js

[error] 45-45: Test failed: should correctly parse and return response headers.

🔇 Additional comments (3)

src/appmixer/utils/http/bundle.json (1)

3-3: Version update and changelog entry look good.

The version increment and changelog entry clearly document the new functionality of adding response headers to the output.

Also applies to: 30-32

src/appmixer/utils/http/http-commons.js (1)

29-29: Change correctly includes response headers in the output.

This change ensures that the HTTP response headers are now included in the output, aligning with the PR's objective.

test/utils/http/http-commons.test.js (1)

13-19: Reconsider test environment setup.

This check for node_modules in the connector folder is unusual. Typically, tests should run independently of the project structure.

Is there a more standard way to ensure test isolation without depending on the absence of node_modules in a specific path?