Bump SnakeYAML to v2.4

[lread]

Closes #152

[lread]

Seems fine, see #152 (comment)

[lread]

Any objections to merging this, @borkdude?

[borkdude]

Does SnakeYAML itself mention any breaking changes in their changellog? If not, go ahead! https://www.michielborkent.nl https://www.eetvoorjeleven.nu

…

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 18:13, Lee Read ***@***.***> wrote: Any objections to merging this, @borkdude <https://github.com/borkdude>? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#155 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACFSBVMJGOZI5N26JNYEXL2RSQFJAVCNFSM6AAAAABX3EZWT2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBSG4YDMMBTGA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***> [image: lread]*lread* left a comment (clj-commons/clj-yaml#155) <#155 (comment)> Any objections to merging this, @borkdude <https://github.com/borkdude>? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#155 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACFSBVMJGOZI5N26JNYEXL2RSQFJAVCNFSM6AAAAABX3EZWT2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMOBSG4YDMMBTGA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lread]

Thanks for the extra set of eyes. No breaking changes listed in SnakeYAML 2.4 changelog. I'll go ahead and merge.