Add proof generation to sequencer #52
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I found the smallest version of what I need for transparency: it should always be possible for a sequencer (that's been initialized) to produce 1) an inclusion proof for the last leaf, and 2) a consistency proof between the current tree and the current tree minus the last leaf. This PR implements those. I also ran the ignored test to make sure there are no cases where these proofs require hashes that aren't in the edge tiles.
I also made some assorted other fixes:
ctlog.rsin the generic log worker tolog_ops.rs, because that's the closest description to what the file does imo